AI-generated
Embed AI permanently, not just introduce it.
Six weeks of structured build: one person learns, documents and trains two colleagues. The workflow stays, even when the tool changes.
Fixed-price engagement · 6 weeks · qualitative range, details in the initial consultation
Practical programme with EU AI Act compliance connection
Six weeks. One person. One documented workflow.
W1 — Champion selection
Identify the right person and narrow down the target process. Clarify tool approval.
- Champion profile: brief note on 4 selection criteria
- Process scoping document (max. 1 page)
- Tool whitelist start: 1–2 approved tools
W2 — First steps
Champion applies the approved tool to the real target process. First workflows emerge.
- First prompt draft for the target process
- Short protocol: what works, what does not
- Open questions for the next support session
W3 — Refine the workflow
Expand the prompt library, write down the step-by-step workflow.
- Written workflow (version 1): step-by-step for colleagues
- Prompt library (3–5 reusable building blocks)
W4 — Stabilise the workflow
Test workflow on real cases, document error sources, define human-in-the-loop.
- Workflow version 2 with human-in-the-loop markers
- Short error and exception list: when does the human step in
W5 — Train colleagues
Champion trains two colleagues. We observe what needs explaining.
- Training protocol: what worked, what was unclear
- Workflow version 3 with improvements from the training
W6 — Evaluation
Measure results, prepare rollout decision or document an honest stop.
- Pilot evaluation: time saved before/after
- Rollout proposal or stop finding (for internal use)
Who is suitable as a champion, and who is not.
Four observable criteria. No job title required, no coding experience. Validation possible in three steps.
Suitable
- Already uses AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude privately, without being prompted
- Names concrete, recurring process pain points, not just "AI is interesting"
- Understands both IT and the business side, can switch between both languages
- Experiments independently, has already tried something without waiting for permission
- Has at least 2 hours per month for structured support, plus their own learning time
Not suitable
- Was nominated by management but shows no personal interest
- Cannot name concrete process pain points, only abstract "AI interest"
- Expects external consultants to build everything without becoming active themselves
- Has no time capacity, insufficient management support for release
3-step validation: 30-minute conversation › have them build a prototype themselves › have them train a colleague.
1st place BitGN Hackathon Vienna · April 2026 (AI Factory Austria)
79 out of 104 points, solo, 11 April 2026. 2nd place: 65 points. A multi-agent system with Soft-SGR and five-layer injection defence. A repeatable process, built daily since late 2024, not invented on the day. Exactly what I pass on in workshops and the champion pilot.
5 questions before our first call
Answer these 5 questions in advance - we will start more efficiently.
Who is the decision-maker? (Business unit, IT, CEO, Compliance)
Why we ask this
Depending on the stakeholder, we need different language, different output formats, and different escalation paths. A CTO asks different questions than a compliance lead.
What budget range is realistic? (Sparring from 450 EUR / Pilot 3,000-5,000 EUR / Custom Build five figures+)
Why we ask this
The budget range determines the format, not the ambition. With this information we can recommend the right format directly, rather than developing options first.
Do I have a concrete use case, or am I still exploring?
Why we ask this
Concrete use case: Sparring or Pilot. Open exploration: Audit as a starting point. This distinction saves both of us half an hour in the first call.
EU AI Act / GDPR: must the solution run on-prem, or is EU-hosted cloud sufficient?
Why we ask this
The hosting requirement fundamentally affects tool selection and pilot scope. Strict on-prem requirements limit available models - better to discuss this upfront.
Who on my team can continue building after the pilot? (1 developer, 1 PM, nobody)
Why we ask this
The Champion Pilot only works if someone can take the baton. If nobody is available today, we plan the programme accordingly - or recommend clarifying team readiness first.
No right or wrong answers. These questions help us suggest the right format without wasting time in the call.
Ready for the first step?
30-minute initial consultation, free of charge. We go through your situation and clarify whether a Champion Pilot fits.